My CMS The View from a New City

February 20, 2026

philosophy

Filed under: daily — Lawrence Peterson @ 5:41 am
Reading philosophy is like watching people beat a dead horse.

February 13, 2026

dissatisfaction

Filed under: daily — Lawrence Peterson @ 12:49 pm

“I have seen the freest and best educated…in the happiest circumstances the world can afford; yet it seemed a cloud hung on their brow and they appeared serious and sad even in their pleasures [because they] never stop thinking of the good things they have not got.” Alexis de Tocqueville

February 11, 2026

Large Language Models

Filed under: daily — Lawrence Peterson @ 4:21 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aI7XknJJC5Q

This discussion ends up stating that AI can’t succeed as general intelligence util it is based on and trained with a model of the real world. The problem is that philosophy and science has been trying to mirror the real world without much success for thousands of years. I AI is trained on a model that is not the real world, how valuable are its pronouncements.


February 7, 2026

Science Gets it Wrong Again

Filed under: daily — Lawrence Peterson @ 8:42 am

Some time ago, Stephen Hawking wrote a book called A Brief History of Time. Hawking concluded his book by saying something like this: We are on the verge of solving the last few issues in science before we complete the Grand Unified Theory of Everything. Then we won’t need to speculate about a God to explain everything about the world that is.

Then science discovered dark matter and dark energy, about which, they confessed, they knew nothing and which comprised something like 95% of everything that is.

Still scientists felt confident in asserting that the whole universe began approximately 13.5 billion years ago in the big bang. Then they learned from their latest telescope, the James Web Telescope, that many things must have existed before 13.5 billion years ago. The big bang is not the answer.

In the 1980s a celebrity cosmologist named Carl Sagan asserted this proposition: Although we do not currently know how the brain works, we know that when we discover the answer, it will be electrical, chemical in nature. Perhaps the reason he could be so sure is because science only has the tools to investigate electrical, chemical phenomena, so no other “explanation” would be acceptable.

But now, even Sagan’s confident assurance turns out to be on shaky ground. See my last post about The Brain as Receiver. If you gave up looking for God because you thought science had all the answers, you too are on shaky ground.


February 3, 2026

Brain as a Receiver

Filed under: daily — Lawrence Peterson @ 10:37 am

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHVDucZ3RHQ

Powered by WordPress